SEC Filing | ManpowerGroup Inc.

View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Form 10-Q

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

x	Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2006

¨	Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from: to

Commission file number: 1-10686

MANPOWER INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Wisconsin		39-1672779
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

5301 N. Ironwood Road Milwaukee, Wisconsin		53217
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (414) 961-1000

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Shares Outstanding at October 31, 2006
Common Stock, $.01 par value		84,943,634

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX


		Page Number
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1	Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3-4

	Consolidated Statements of Operations	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7-17

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18-28

Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29

Item 4	Controls and Procedures	29

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2	Unregistered Sale of Equity and Use of Proceeds	30

Item 5	Other Information	31

Item 6	Exhibits	32

SIGNATURES		33

EXHIBIT INDEX		34

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements (unaudited)

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(in millions)

ASSETS


	September 30, 2006		December 31, 2005
CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	484.5	$	454.9
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $101.3 and $86.5, respectively		3,772.1		3,208.2
Prepaid expenses and other assets		104.4		107.5
Future income tax benefits		95.5		71.1

Total current assets		4,456.5		3,841.7

OTHER ASSETS:

Goodwill		955.3		923.9
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $40.1 and $29.8, respectively		324.6		332.6
Other assets		308.5		273.8

Total other assets		1,588.4		1,530.3

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:

Land, buildings, leasehold improvements and equipment		686.0		642.4
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		491.4		446.0

Net property and equipment		194.6		196.4

Total assets	$	6,239.5	$	5,568.4

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

are an integral part of these balance sheets.

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(in millions, except share and per share data)

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY


	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Accounts payable	$	883.6		$	685.4
Employee compensation payable		175.3			150.6
Accrued liabilities		598.0			435.4
Accrued payroll taxes and insurance		629.6			607.2
Value added taxes payable		524.4			441.9
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt		28.4			260.0

Total current liabilities		2,839.3			2,580.5

OTHER LIABILITIES:

Long-term debt		759.9			475.0
Other long-term liabilities		399.6			366.3

Total other liabilities		1,159.5			841.3

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Preferred stock, $.01 par value, authorized 25,000,000 shares, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 125,000,000 shares, issued 102,323,453 and 101,239,813 shares, respectively		1.0			1.0
Capital in excess of par value		2,397.8			2,346.7
Retained earnings		479.8			269.9
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		47.8			(11.0	)
Treasury stock at cost, 17,840,405 and 13,867,805 shares, respectively		(685.7	)		(460.0	)

Total shareholders’ equity		2,240.7			2,146.6

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	6,239.5		$	5,568.4

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

are an integral part of these balance sheets.

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(in millions, except per share data)


	3 Months Ended September 30,				9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenues from services	$	4,644.8	$	4,144.8	$	13,014.7	$	11,957.2
Cost of services		3,800.6		3,388.2		10,636.7		9,779.4

Gross profit		844.2		756.6		2,378.0		2,177.8
Selling and administrative expenses		675.3		624.6		2,010.3		1,873.6

Operating profit		168.9		132.0		367.7		304.2
Interest and other expenses		10.6		11.9		6.8		34.9

Earnings before income taxes		158.3		120.1		360.9		269.3
Provision for income taxes		57.7		43.8		127.3		98.3

Net earnings	$	100.6	$	76.3	$	233.6	$	171.0

Net earnings per share	$	1.18	$	0.88	$	2.70	$	1.93

Net earnings per share – diluted	$	1.16	$	0.87	$	2.65	$	1.88

Weighted average common shares		85.3		87.0		86.5		88.4

Weighted average common shares – diluted		86.7		88.2		88.0		91.7

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

are an integral part of these statements.

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in millions)


	9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings	$	233.6		$	171.0
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		65.8			67.7
Amortization of discount on convertible debentures		—			1.9
Deferred income taxes		(22.2	)		(10.2	)
Provision for doubtful accounts		18.6			16.9
Stock-based compensation		15.9			1.2
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options		(7.0	)		—
Other non-operating gains		(29.3	)		—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the impact of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(396.2	)		(307.1	)
Other assets		22.7			(30.2	)
Other liabilities		324.2			263.8

Cash provided by operating activities		226.1			175.0

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures		(47.3	)		(55.9	)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired		(7.8	)		(3.5	)
Proceeds from the sale of business		29.6			—
Proceeds from the sale of an equity interest		8.8			—
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment		3.6			4.5

Cash used by investing activities		(13.1	)		(54.9	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in short-term borrowings		4.6			8.8
Proceeds from debt facilities		295.5			786.2
Repayments of debt facilities		(300.7	)		(614.0	)
Cash paid to settle convertible debentures		—			(206.6	)
Proceeds from settlement of swap agreements		—			50.7
Proceeds from stock option and purchase plans		45.2			17.7
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options		7.0			—
Repurchases of common stock		(235.9	)		(203.5	)
Dividends paid		(23.7	)		(17.6	)

Cash used by financing activities		(208.0	)		(178.3	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		24.6			(41.9	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		29.6			(100.1	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		454.9			531.8

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	484.5		$	431.7

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	45.0		$	41.9

Income taxes paid	$	63.0		$	65.7

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

are an integral part of these statements.

MANPOWER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

(in millions, except share and per share data)

(1) Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in our 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders.

The information furnished reflects all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the periods presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Reorganization Costs

In the first quarter of 2006, we recorded expenses totaling $9.5 in the United Kingdom and $1.2 at Right Management for severances and other office closure costs related to reorganizations at these entities. Of the $9.5 in the United Kingdom, $4.1 was paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and we expect a majority of the remaining $5.4 will be paid before the end of 2006. All of the reorganization costs at Right Management were paid during the three months ended March 31, 2006.

In 2005, we recorded total expenses of $15.3 in France and $4.0 at Right Management for severance costs related to reorganizations in both segments. As of September 30, 2006, $7.6 has been paid from the France reserve, $6.3 of which was paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The majority of the remaining $7.7 is expected to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2006. The full $4.0 recorded at Right Management was paid in 2005.

(2) New Accounting Standards

During July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and Related Implementation Issues,” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently in the process of evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for us in 2008. We are currently assessing the impact of the adoption of this statement.

During September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires that we recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined benefit and retiree medical plans (our “Plans”) as an asset or liability in our consolidated balance sheets, with changes in the funded status recognized through comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. We estimate the impact of adopting SFAS 158 to be approximately $5.0, using current exchange rates, which will result in a reduction in Shareholder’s Equity on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. SFAS 158 will also require expanded disclosures in our notes to consolidated financial statements, but will have no impact on our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows for the year ending December 31, 2006. SFAS 158 also requires us to measure the funded status of our Plans as of the balance sheet date, rather than as of an earlier measurement date, by 2008. We do not expect the impact of the change in measurement date to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

(3) Stock Compensation Plans

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), using the modified prospective application transition method. The modified prospective application transition method requires compensation cost to be recognized beginning on the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. As such, prior periods will not reflect restated amounts. Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for all of our fixed stock option plans and our 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options or our stock purchase plans was reflected in Net Earnings prior to January 1, 2006. SFAS 123R requires us to report the tax benefit from the tax deduction that is in excess of recognized compensation costs (excess tax benefits) as a financing cash flow. Prior to January 1, 2006, we reported the entire tax benefit related to the exercise of stock options as an operating cash flow.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized approximately $5.7 and $15.9, respectively, in share-based compensation expense related to stock options, deferred stock, restricted stock, and an employee stock purchase plan. Cash received from stock option exercises for the same periods was $4.6 and $45.2, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized related to share-based compensation, which is recorded in Capital in Excess of Par Value, was approximately $7.0 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. We recognize compensation expense on grants of share-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the service period of each award recipient.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, Operating Profit and Earnings Before Income Taxes decreased by $4.0 and $11.5 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Net Earnings decreased by $2.6 and $7.4, or $0.03 and $0.08, respectively, per basic and diluted share for the same periods as a result of the expense recorded related to our stock option grants and our employee stock purchase plan. The following table illustrates the effect on Net Earnings and Net Earnings Per Share had we applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R to stock-based employee compensation for periods prior to its adoption:


	3 Months Ended September 30, 2005			9 Months Ended September 30, 2005
Net earnings, as reported	$	76.3		$	171.0
Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under APB No. 25, net of related tax effects⁽¹⁾		0.2			0.8
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(2.4	)		(8.4	)

Pro forma net earnings		74.1			163.4
Add: Amortization of discount on convertible debentures, net of taxes		—			1.2

Pro forma net earnings – diluted	$	74.1		$	164.6

Net earnings per share:
As reported	$	0.88		$	1.93
Pro forma	$	0.86		$	1.86
Net earnings per share – diluted:
As reported	$	0.87		$	1.88
Pro forma	$	0.85		$	1.81

(1)	The above stock-based employee compensation expense is related to restricted stock and deferred stock.

Stock Options

All stock-based compensation is currently granted under our 2003 Equity Incentive Plan of Manpower Inc. (“2003 Plan”). Options and stock appreciation rights are granted at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock at the date of grant. Generally, options are granted with a vesting period of up to four years and expire ten years from date of grant. As of September 30, 2006, no stock appreciation rights had been granted or were outstanding.

We also maintain the Savings Related Share Option Scheme for United Kingdom employees with at least one year of service. The employees are offered the opportunity to obtain an option for a specified number of shares of common stock at not less than 85% of its market value on the day prior to the offer to participate in the plan. Options vest after either three, five or seven years, but may lapse earlier. Funds used to purchase the shares are accumulated through specified payroll deductions over a 60-month period.

A summary of stock option activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is as follows:


	Shares (in thousands)	Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price Per Share		Wtd. Avg. Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, January 1, 2006	5,421	$	36.2
Granted	1,009		52.0
Exercised	1,244		32.8		$	30.1
Forfeited or expired	205		39.8

Outstanding, September 30, 2006	4,981	$	40.2	7.0	$	105.0

Exercisable, September 30, 2006	2,336	$	34.2	5.6	$	63.2

We have recognized expenses of $3.3 and $10.1 related to stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The total fair value of options vested during the same periods was $0.3 and $15.5, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, total unrecognized compensation cost was approximately $27.2, net of estimated forfeitures, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.0 years.

We estimated the fair value of each stock option on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:


	9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005
Average risk-free interest rate	4.7	%	3.8	%
Expected dividend yield	1.1	%	0.9	%
Expected volatility	30.0	%	30.0	%
Expected term (years)	5.0		4.7

The average risk-free interest rate is based on the five-year U.S. Treasury security rate in effect as of the grant date. The expected dividend yield is based on the expected annual dividend as a percentage of the market value of our common stock as of the grant date. We determined expected volatility using a weighted average of daily historical volatility (weighted 40 percent) of our stock price over the past five years and implied volatility (weighted 60 percent) based upon exchange traded options for our common stock. We believe that a blend of historical volatility and implied volatility better reflects future market conditions and better indicates expected volatility than considering purely historical volatility. We determined the expected term of the stock options using historical data. The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $16.26 and $12.92 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Deferred Stock

Our non-employee directors may elect to receive deferred stock in lieu of part or all of their annual cash retainer otherwise payable to them. The number of shares of deferred stock is determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the terms and conditions adopted under the 2003 Plan and the deferred stock is settled in shares of common stock according to the terms and conditions under the 2003 Plan. As of September 30, 2006, there were 7,132 shares of deferred stock awarded under this arrangement, all of which are vested.

Effective January 1, 2006, non-employee directors also receive an annual grant of deferred stock (or restricted stock, if they so elect) as additional compensation for board service. The award vests in equal quarterly installments and the vested portion of the deferred stock is settled in shares of common stock after three years (which may be extended at the directors’ election) in accordance with the terms and conditions under the 2003 Plan. As of September, 2006, there were 17,612 shares of deferred stock and 7,548 shares of restricted stock granted under this arrangement, of which 3,226 shares of deferred stock and 1,613 shares of restricted stock are unvested. We have recognized expenses of $0.2 and $0.6 related to deferred stock during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The remaining $0.2 of unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested deferred stock will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006.

Restricted Stock

We also grant restricted stock awards to certain employees and non-employee directors, who may elect to receive restricted stock rather than deferred stock as described above. Restrictions lapse over periods ranging up to six years. We value restricted stock awards at the closing market value of our common stock on the date of grant.

A summary of restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 is as follows:


	Shares (in thousands)	Wtd. Avg. Price Per Share		Wtd. Avg. Remaining Contractual Term (years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Unvested, January 1, 2006	202	$	41.13
Granted	53		52.08
Vested	38		35.84
Forfeited	5		44.08

Unvested, September 30, 2006	212	$	44.78	3.1	$	3.5

We have recognized expense of $0.5 and $1.7 for vested restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. As of September 30, 2006, there was approximately $6.5 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.8 years.

Performance Share Units

In 2005, we amended our 2003 Plan to permit the grant of performance share units. Vesting of units occurs at the end of the performance period, generally three years, except in the case of death, disability or termination of employment. A payout multiple is applied to the units awarded based on the performance criteria determined by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The performance criteria for performance share units granted in February 2006 was average Operating Profit Margin. The units are then settled in shares of our common stock. Holders of performance share units do not receive dividends during the performance period. Accordingly, the fair value of these units is the quoted market value of our stock on the date of the grant.

The Target Awards for the 2006-2008 performance period are based on average Operating Profit Margin growth over the performance period. In the event this measure exceeds the target, an additional number of shares up to 175% of the Target Award may be granted. In the event this measure falls below the target performance level, a reduced number of shares as few as the Threshold Award, which is equal to 25% of the Target Award, may be granted. If Operating Profit Margin falls below the threshold performance level, no shares will be granted.

The following table summarizes the performance share unit activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:


		Share Units
Outstanding, January 1, 2006		—
Granted		210,875
Vested		—
Forfeited		17,500

Outstanding, September 30, 2006		193,375

Threshold Award		30,125
Target Award		120,500
Outstanding Award		210,875

We recognize compensation expense when it becomes probable that the performance criteria specified in the award will be achieved. The compensation expense is recognized over the performance period and is recorded in Selling and Administrative Expenses. We currently believe the average Operating Unit Profit Margin growth for the 2006-2008 performance period will likely exceed the target performance level; accordingly, we recognized compensation expense of $0.9 and $2.0 related to this performance period during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively.

Other Stock Plans

Under the 1990 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, designated employees meeting certain service requirements may purchase shares of our common stock through payroll deductions. These shares may be purchased at the lesser of 85% of their fair market value at the beginning or end of each year.

The fair value of each share purchased under the plan is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following weighted-average assumptions:


	9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005
Average risk-free interest rate	4.4	%	2.8	%
Expected dividend yield	1.1	%	0.9	%
Expected volatility	30.0	%	30.0	%
Expected term (years)	1.0		1.0

These assumptions are determined using the same methodology applied in determining the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of our stock options.

We have recognized expense of $0.7 and $1.4 for shares expected to be purchased under the plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. There is approximately $0.3 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the plan, which will be recognized during the remainder of 2006.

(4) Acquisitions and Dispositions

From time to time, we acquire and invest in companies throughout the world, including franchises. The total cash consideration paid for acquisitions in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was $7.8.

On January 31, 2006, following approval from the Swedish Competition Authorities, we sold a non-core payroll processing business in Sweden. A pre-tax gain of $29.3 ($23.7 after tax, or $0.27 per share – diluted) related to this sale was recorded in the first quarter of 2006. Net proceeds from this transaction were $29.6.

In December 2005, we sold one of our available-for-sale investments for a gain of $2.6. Proceeds from this transaction of $8.8 were received in the first quarter of 2006.

In connection with the acquisition of Right Management in 2004, we established reserves for severance and other office lease closure costs related to streamlining Right Management’s worldwide operations totaling $24.5. As of September 30, 2006, approximately $21.5 has been paid from these reserves, of which $2.1 was paid in the first nine months of 2006. Approximately $1.0 of the remaining $3.0 will be paid in the fourth quarter of 2006, with the remaining $2.0 to be paid by 2008.

(5) Income Taxes

We provided for income taxes during the first nine months of 2006 at a rate of 35.3% based on our current estimate of the annual effective tax rate. This rate includes the impact of certain discrete items in the first quarter of 2006, including the reorganization charges, the gain on sale of the business in Sweden and costs related to our global cost reduction project. Our current estimate of the annual effective tax rate, excluding the discrete items, is 36.5%. Including these items, we estimate our annual effective tax rate will be 35.5%. This rate is higher than the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the impact of higher foreign income tax rates, U.S. taxes on foreign earnings and U.S. state income taxes.

(6) Earnings Per Share

The calculations of Net Earnings Per Share and Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted are as follows:


	3 Months Ended September 30,				9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Net Earnings Per Share:
Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	100.6	$	76.3	$	233.6	$	171.0
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions)		85.3		87.0		86.5		88.4

	$	1.18	$	0.88	$	2.70	$	1.93

Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted:
Net earnings	$	100.6	$	76.3	$	233.6	$	171.0
Add: Amortization related to convertible debt, net of taxes		—		—		—		1.2

Net earnings available to common shareholders	$	100.6	$	76.3	$	233.6	$	172.2

Weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions)		85.3		87.0		86.5		88.4
Effect of restricted stock grants		0.2		0.2		0.3		0.2
Effect of dilutive stock options		1.2		1.0		1.2		1.1
Effect of convertible debentures		—		—		—		2.0

		86.7		88.2		88.0		91.7

	$	1.16	$	0.87	$	2.65	$	1.88

The calculation of Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 does not include options to purchase 100,000 and 1,300,000 common shares, respectively, because the exercise price for these options is greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period. There were no options excluded from the calculation for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006.

(7) Debt

On June 14, 2006, we offered and sold €200.0 aggregate principal amount of 4.75% notes due June 14, 2013 (the “€200 Notes”). The net proceeds of €198.1 ($249.5) were invested in cash equivalents until July 26, 2006, when they were used to repay our €200.0 notes due July 2006 (the “1999 €200 Notes”) as described below. The €200 Notes were issued at a price of 99.349% to yield an effective interest rate of 4.862%. The discount of €1.3 ($1.6) will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the €200 Notes. Interest is payable annually on June 14 beginning in 2007. The €200 Notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all of our existing and future senior unsecured debt and other liabilities. We may redeem the €200 Notes, in whole but not in part, at our option at any time for a redemption price determined in accordance with the term of the €200 Notes. The €200 Notes also contain certain customary restrictive covenants and events of default.

Our 1999 €200 Notes ($254.3), due July 2006, were retired on July 26, 2006 with the net proceeds from the €200 Notes and other available cash.

(8) Accounts Receivable Securitization

In July 2006, we amended our $200.0 Receivables Facility, extending its maturity to July 2007 and reducing the fees for the facility. All other terms remain substantially unchanged. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of September 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.

(9) Retirement Plans

The components of the net periodic benefit cost for our plans are as follows:


	Defined Benefit Pension Plans
	3 Months Ended September 30,						9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Service cost	$	3.1		$	2.7		$	9.0		$	8.4
Interest cost		3.5			3.0			10.2			9.2
Expected return on assets		(2.9	)		(2.4	)		(8.4	)		(7.4	)
Amortization of unrecognized loss		1.1			0.8			3.3			2.3

Total benefit cost	$	4.8		$	4.1		$	14.1		$	12.5


	Retiree Health Care Plan
	3 Months Ended September 30,					9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005		2006			2005
Service cost	$	0.1		$	0.1	$	0.3		$	0.3
Interest cost		0.3			0.3		0.9			1.0
Amortization of unrecognized gain		(0.2	)		—		(0.5	)		(0.2	)

Total benefit cost	$	0.2		$	0.4	$	0.7		$	1.1

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, contributions made to our pension plans were $1.0 and $10.3, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, contributions made to our retiree health care plan were $0.5 and $1.0, respectively. We continue to expect total contributions of $15.6 to our pension plans and $1.2 to our retiree health care plan during 2006.

(10) Shareholders’ Equity

The components of Comprehensive Income, net of tax, are as follows:


	3 Months Ended September 30,						9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006		2005
Net earnings	$	100.6		$	76.3		$	233.6	$	171.0
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation (loss) income		(22.3	)		(19.2	)		55.5		(99.3	)
Unrealized gain on investments		1.3			1.6			0.7		3.8
Unrealized gain on derivatives		—			1.3			2.6		1.2

Comprehensive income	$	79.6		$	60.0		$	292.4	$	76.7

The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax, are as follows:


	September 30, 2006			December 31, 2005
Foreign currency translation gain	$	71.3		$	15.8
Unrealized gain on investments		7.6			6.9
Unrealized loss on derivatives		(5.8	)		(8.4	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment		(25.3	)		(25.3	)

Accumulated comprehensive income (loss)	$	47.8		$	(11.0	)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, we repurchased a total of 2,002,300 and 3,972,600 shares of common stock, respectively, for a total cost of $116.8 and $235.9, respectively. Including repurchases in 2005, a total of 4,272,600 shares of common stock, at a total cost of $250.0, have been repurchased under our 2005 authorization, completing the repurchases allowed under the authorization.

On April 25, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.27 per share, which was paid on June 14, 2006 to shareholders of record on June 5, 2006.

On October 31, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.32 per share, which is payable on December 15, 2006 to shareholders of record on December 5, 2006.

The Board of Directors also authorized the repurchase of an additional 5 million shares of our common stock, not to exceed a total purchase price of $325.0. Share repurchases may be made from time to time and may be implemented through a variety of methods, including open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, forward repurchase agreements or similar facilities.

(11) Interest and Other Expenses

Interest and Other Expenses consists of the following:


	3 Months Ended September 30,						9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
Interest expense	$	14.4		$	12.5		$	39.1		$	34.8
Interest income		(4.4	)		(2.0	)		(11.5	)		(6.4	)
Foreign exchange loss (gain)		0.3			(0.2	)		2.5			—
Miscellaneous expense (income), net		0.3			1.6			(23.3	)		6.5

Interest and other expenses	$	10.6		$	11.9		$	6.8		$	34.9

Miscellaneous Expense (Income) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 includes a non-operating gain of $29.3 ($23.7 after tax, $0.27 per share – diluted), primarily related to the sale of a non-core payroll processing business in Sweden. Net proceeds from this transaction were $29.6.

(12) Segment Data


	3 Months Ended September 30,				9 Months Ended September 30,
	2006		2005		2006		2005
Revenues from Services: (a)
United States (b)	$	542.1	$	531.5	$	1,587.0	$	1,514.1
France		1,654.0		1,479.3		4,430.1		4,114.3
EMEA		1,668.0		1,400.8		4,691.0		4,173.8
Jefferson Wells		93.9		103.9		288.2		290.1
Right Management		91.4		96.0		291.3		308.5
Other Operations		595.4		533.3		1,727.1		1,556.4

Consolidated (b)	$	4,644.8	$	4,144.8	$	13,014.7	$	11,957.2

Operating Unit Profit: (a)
United States	$	28.6	$	22.6	$	60.6	$	45.5
France		62.0		50.6		142.1		121.0
EMEA		71.0		46.2		145.1		98.2
Jefferson Wells		10.0		11.5		25.7		28.9
Right Management		1.8		2.1		17.2		21.2
Other Operations		16.7		16.6		49.4		42.3

Consolidated		190.1		149.6		440.1		357.1
Corporate expenses		17.9		14.3		62.6		43.1
Amortization of other intangible assets		3.3		3.3		9.8		9.8
Interest and other expense		10.6		11.9		6.8		34.9

Earnings before income taxes	$	158.3	$	120.1	$	360.9	$	269.3

(a)

Certain Eastern European countries previously reported in France are now reported in EMEA due to a change in management structure. All previously reported results for France and EMEA have been revised to conform to the current year presentation. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 there was $15.3 and $36.1 of Revenues from Services and $(0.4) and $(1.8) of Operating Unit Profit previously reported in France now reported in EMEA related to this change.

(b)

In the United States, where a majority of our franchises operate, Revenues from Services include fees received from franchise offices of $6.6 and $6.7 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $17.9 and $18.4 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These fees are primarily based on revenues generated by the franchise offices, which were $285.9 and $310.7 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $860.1 and $885.1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Our consolidated Revenues from Services include fees received from our franchise offices of $9.6 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $26.4 and $26.7 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These fees are primarily based on revenues generated by the franchise offices, which were $392.3 and $396.6 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $1,143.8 and $1,122.1 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Operating Results - Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Revenues from Services increased 12.1% to $4,644.8 million for the third quarter of 2006 from the same period in 2005. Revenues were positively impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates during the period due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar relative to the currencies in most of our non-U.S. markets. In constant currency, revenues increased 8.8%. This growth rate is a result of increased demand for our services in most of our markets, including the United States, France, EMEA and Other Operations, where revenues increased 2.0%, 7.0%, 13.9% and 13.4%, respectively, on a constant currency basis. We also saw solid growth in our permanent recruitment business which increased 37.7% on a consolidated basis in constant currency. (See Financial Measures on page 23 and 24 for further information on constant currency.)

Gross Profit increased 11.6% to $844.2 million for the third quarter of 2006. In constant currency, Gross Profit increased 8.6%. Gross Profit Margin was 18.2%, a decrease of 0.07% from the third quarter of 2005. This decline in Gross Profit Margin is primarily a result of the change in the mix of services provided (-0.44%) primarily due to a lower amount of revenues coming from Right Management and Jefferson Wells, where the gross profit margin is generally higher than the company average. This decrease is partially offset by an increase in our permanent recruitment business (+0.25%) as well as an increase in gross profit margin for the temporary recruitment business (+0.12%). Temporary recruitment margins have increased as a result of improved pricing discipline in many markets, including France, and improved margins in other markets as a result of lower direct costs (such as workers’ compensation and state unemployment taxes in the U.S.).

Selling and Administrative Expenses increased 8.1% from the third quarter of 2005, to $675.3 million in the third quarter of 2006. These expenses increased 5.3% in constant currency. This increase is primarily in response to the increase in business volumes, as well as expensing the value of stock options for the first time in 2006 ($4.0 million). As a percent of revenues, Selling and Administrative Expenses were 14.5% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to 15.1% in the third quarter of 2005, which reflects the favorable impact of our cost control efforts and productivity gains, as we have been able to increase the billable hours from our staffing business without a similar increase in branch headcount, offset by the impact of our continued investments in new offices and the permanent recruitment business in certain markets.

Operating Profit increased 28.0% for the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005, with an Operating Profit Margin of 3.6% in 2006 compared to 3.2% in 2005. This improvement reflects the favorable impact of our cost control efforts and productivity gains, offset by the decline in Gross Profit Margin.

Interest and Other (Income) Expense was expense of $10.6 million in the third quarter of 2006 compared to $11.9 million for the same period in 2005. Net Interest Expense decreased $0.5 million in the quarter to $10.0, as the increase in interest income, due to increased cash levels and investment rates, exceeded the increase in interest expense. Translation losses in the third quarter of 2006 were $0.3 million compared to gains of $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2005. Miscellaneous Expense, net, which consists of bank fees and other non-operating income and expenses, was expense of $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2006 compared to expense of $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2005.

We provided for income taxes during the third quarter of 2006 at a rate of 36.5% based on our current estimate of the annual effective tax rate excluding the discrete items in the first quarter. This rate is higher than the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the impact of higher foreign income tax rates and U.S. taxes on foreign earnings, and U.S. state income taxes.

Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted increased 33.3% to $1.16 in the third quarter of 2006 compared to $0.87 in the third quarter of 2005. The higher foreign currency exchange rates positively impacted Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted by approximately $0.04 in the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. Weighted-Average Shares – Diluted were 86.7 million in the third quarter of 2006, a decline of 1.8% from the third quarter of 2005. This decline is a result of share repurchases during 2005 and during the first nine months of 2006.

Operating Results - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Revenues from Services increased 8.8% to $13,014.7 million for the first nine months of 2006 from the same period in 2005. Revenues were negatively impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates during the period due to the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar relative to the currencies in most of our non-U.S. markets. In constant currency, revenues increased 10.0%. This growth rate is a result of increased demand for our services in most of our markets, including the United States, France, EMEA, and Other Operations, where revenues increased 4.8%, 8.6%, 13.8%, and 13.9%, respectively, on a constant currency basis. We also saw solid growth in our permanent recruitment business which increased 38.6% on a consolidated basis in constant currency. (See Financial Measures on page 23 and 24 for further information on constant currency.)

Gross Profit increased 9.2% to $2,378.0 million for the first nine months of 2006. In constant currency, Gross Profit increased 10.3%. Gross Profit Margin was 18.3%, an increase of 0.06% from the first nine months of 2005. The increase in Gross Profit Margin is primarily a result of an increase in our permanent recruitment business (+0.25%) as well as an increase in gross profit margin in the temporary recruitment business (+0.14%). Temporary recruitment margins have increased as a result of improved pricing discipline in some markets, including France, and improved margins in other markets as a result of lower direct costs (such as workers’ compensation and state unemployment taxes in the U.S.). This improvement is partially offset by a change in the mix of services provided (-0.33%) primarily due to a lower amount of revenues coming from Right Management, where the gross profit margin is generally higher than the company average.

Selling and Administrative Expenses increased 7.3% from the first nine months of 2005, to $2,010.3 million in the first nine months of 2006. These expenses increased 8.6% in constant currency. This increase is primarily in response to the increase in business volumes, expensing the value of stock options for the first time in 2006 ($11.5 million), and certain expenses related to reorganizations ($9.0 million) and global cost reduction project costs ($9.2 million). As a percent of revenues, Selling and Administrative Expenses were 15.4% in the first nine months of 2006 compared to 15.7% in the first nine months of 2005. The improvement in Selling and Administrative Expenses as a percent of revenues reflects a favorable impact of our cost control efforts and productivity gains, as we have been able to increase the billable hours from our staffing business as well as our permanent placements without a similar increase in branch headcount. These improvements are offset by the impact of the reorganization charges and global cost reduction project costs ($18.2 million, 0.14% of revenue) and our continued investments in new offices and the permanent recruitment business in certain markets.

Operating Profit increased 20.9% for the first nine months of 2006 compared to 2005, with an Operating Profit Margin of 2.8% in 2006 compared to 2.5% in 2005. On a constant currency basis, Operating Profit increased 21.1%. The margin improvement reflects the increased Gross Profit Margin coupled with the improvements in SG&A. The reorganization charges and global cost reduction project costs accounted for a 6.0% reduction in Operating Profit and a 0.14% decrease in Operating Profit Margin for the first nine months of 2006.

Interest and Other (Income) Expense was expense of $6.8 million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $34.9 million for the same period in 2005. Net Interest Expense decreased $0.8 million in the first nine months of 2006, to $27.6 million, as the increase in interest income, due to increased cash levels and investment rates, exceeded the increase in interest expense. Translation losses in the first nine months of 2006 were $2.5 million compared to no translation effect in the first nine months of 2005. Miscellaneous income, net, which consists of bank fees and other non-operating income and expenses, was $23.3 million of income in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $6.5 million of expense in the first nine months of 2005. In the first nine months of 2006, Miscellaneous income included non-operating gains of $29.3 million ($0.27 per share-diluted) related to the sale of a payroll processing business in Sweden.

We provided for income taxes during the first nine months of 2006 at a rate of 35.3%. This rate includes the impact of certain discrete items in the first quarter of 2006, including the reorganization charges, the gain on sale of the business in Sweden and costs related to our global cost reduction project. Excluding the impact of these items, we provided for income taxes at a rate of 36.5%. Our current estimate of the annual effective tax rate, excluding the discrete items, is 36.5%. Including these items, we estimate our annual effective tax rate will be 35.5%. This rate is higher than the U.S. Federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to the impact of higher foreign income tax rates, U.S. taxes on foreign earnings and U.S. state income taxes.

Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted increased 41.0% to $2.65 in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $1.88 in the first nine months of 2005. The higher foreign currency exchange rates negatively impacted Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted by approximately $0.02 in the first nine months of 2006 compared to 2005. Weighted-Average Shares – Diluted were 88.0 million in the first nine months of 2006, a decline of 4.0% from the same period of 2005. This decline is primarily a result of share repurchases in 2005 and the first nine months of 2006, and the redemption of our convertible debentures in March 2005.

On February 28, 2005, we called our convertible debentures, which resulted in 1,378,670 shares being issued as of March 30, 2005 for those debentures that were converted to shares. The remaining debentures were settled for cash. The dilutive effect of these debentures is included in our Net Earnings Per Share – Diluted calculation using the “if-converted” method for the period January 1, 2005 through March 29, 2005.

Segment Operating Results

United States

In the United States, revenues increased 2.0% for the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005, due primarily to higher billing rates and an increase in our permanent recruitment business. Our industrial business experienced a year-over-year growth of 5.9% in the third quarter. Our professional business continues to show improving revenue growth, with a year-over-year growth rate of 12.5% in the third quarter, up from a slight revenue increase of 1.3% in the second quarter, while the year-over-year growth rate in the placement of our skilled office workers has declined through the year, with flat revenues in the third quarter compared to revenue growth of 6.3% in the second quarter.

Gross Profit Margin increased during the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 due to improved margins on our staffing business, as a result of a decrease in state unemployment taxes and lower workers’ compensation costs, and growth in our permanent recruitment business.

Selling and Administrative Expenses were well controlled during the quarter and increased at a slightly higher rate than revenues. The increase is due to higher personnel costs, primarily to support the growth in the permanent recruitment business, and higher advertising costs, resulting from the launch of our new brand in February 2006.

Operating Unit Profit (“OUP”) Margin in the United States was 5.3% and 4.3% for the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. This improvement is primarily related to the increased Gross Profit Margin. For the first nine months of 2006, OUP Margin was 3.8% compared to 3.0% in 2005.

France

In France, revenues increased 11.8% (7.0% in Euro) during the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. This growth rate in Euro is slightly lower than that experienced in the first two quarters of 2006, due to fewer working days in the third quarter. On an average daily basis, revenue growth has improved each quarter. Revenues in the first nine months of 2006 increased 7.7% (8.6% in Euro) above prior year levels.

Gross Profit Margin in the third quarter of 2006 was equal to the third quarter of 2005 as a result of pricing pressures beginning to stabilize in the French market.

Selling and Administrative Expenses increased slightly during the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to investments in the permanent recruitment business. Expenses continue to be well controlled and decreased as a percentage of revenue in the quarter, as we were able to leverage existing cost base to support the increased revenues without a similar increase in expenses.

During the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, OUP Margin in France was 3.7% and 3.4%, respectively, and 3.2% and 2.9% for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. This improvement reflects improved productivity and leveraging of Selling and Administrative Expenses.

EMEA

In EMEA, which represents operations throughout Europe, the Middle East and Africa (excluding France), revenues increased 19.1% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 (an increase of 13.9% on a constant currency basis). Local currency revenue growth was experienced in most major markets with the highest growth rates reported in the Netherlands, Italy, and Sweden. Permanent placement revenues have increased over 26.0% (over 27.0% on a constant currency basis) for both the third quarter and the first nine months of 2006 as a result of our investments in this business.

Gross Profit Margin increased in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to the increase in permanent recruitment revenues and improved pricing discipline in many markets.

Selling and Administrative Expenses increased during the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 due to the need to support the increased business volumes. Selling and Administrative Expenses as a percent of revenues decreased in the quarter compared to the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to productivity improvements, as EMEA has been able to increase the billable hours from the staffing business and increase permanent placements without a similar increase in branch headcount. Expenses during the first nine months of 2006 increased compared to the first nine months of 2005. A portion of this increase is due to $7.8 million of reorganization charges recorded in the United Kingdom in the first quarter.

OUP Margin for EMEA was 4.3% and 3.3% for the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 3.1% and 2.4% for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. This margin improvement was primarily the result of leveraging our expense base with the increased revenue and gross profit levels.

Jefferson Wells

Revenues for Jefferson Wells in the third quarter of 2006 decreased 9.6% compared to the third quarter of 2005 due primarily to the decline in Sarbanes-Oxley related control services. Revenue growth also declined from the growth rates in the first half of the year due primarily to declines at two large customers where revenues declined from $21.3 million in the second quarter to $10.5 million in the third quarter. Revenues in the first nine months of 2006 are 0.6% below prior year levels.

The Gross Profit Margin in the third quarter of 2006 declined compared to the third quarter of 2005 due to the change in the mix of business towards services with lower gross profit margins, mainly due to one of the large customers noted above, which has a lower than average Gross Profit Margin. Gross Profit Margin for the third quarter has improved from the first two quarters of 2006 due to changes in the mix of business, again mainly due to the impact of this one large customer, as revenues were lower in the third quarter than earlier in the year.

Selling and Administrative Expenses decreased 11.5% during the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 mainly due to a reduction in office expenses as a result of cost control efforts. Total expenses are in line with expense levels in the first and second quarters. Expenses as a percentage of revenues improved in the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005.

The OUP Margin for Jefferson Wells in the third quarter of 2006 was 10.6% compared to 11.1% in the third quarter of 2005. This decrease is due to the decline in Gross Profit Margin, partially offset by the improvement in Selling and Administrative Expenses. For the first nine months of 2006, the OUP Margin was 8.9% compared to 10.0% in 2005.

Right Management

Revenues for Right Management in the third quarter of 2006 decreased 4.8% compared to the third quarter of 2005 (a decrease of 7.0% on a constant currency basis). This decrease is the result of lower demand for outplacement services as economies in major markets continue to improve, offset by improving demand for Right Management’s organizational consulting services. Revenues in the first nine months of 2006 were 5.6% below prior year (a decrease of 5.1% in constant currency).

Gross Profit Margin decreased in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 as a result of changes in the mix of business between outplacement and organizational consulting services.

Selling and Administrative Expenses decreased in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 due to reduced personnel and office expenses. Expenses as a percent of revenues were lower in the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005 as cost reductions exceeded the decline in revenues.

OUP Margin for Right Management was 2.0% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2.2% in the third quarter of 2005. This decline in margin is primarily the result of the decline in Gross Profit Margin, offset by the improvement in Selling and Administrative Expenses. OUP Margin for Right Management is generally lowest in the third quarter due to the seasonality of that business. OUP Margin for the first nine months of 2006 was 5.9% compared to 6.9% in the first nine months of 2005.

Other Operations

Revenues for Other Operations increased 11.6% (13.4% in constant currency) during the third quarter of 2006 compared to 2005. Revenue increases for the third quarter, in constant currency, were experienced in virtually all markets in this segment, including Argentina, Mexico and Japan which experienced local currency revenue growth rates of 47.8%, 22.6%, and 3.4%, respectively. India and China also experienced significant growth with both reporting revenues nearly double that of the third quarter of 2005. Permanent recruitment revenues increased 31.9% in constant currency as a result of ongoing investments in this business. For the first nine months of 2006, revenues for this segment have increased 11.0% from the year earlier period (13.9% in constant currency).

The Gross Profit Margin decreased slightly in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 primarily due to a shift in the mix of business toward those countries with lower gross profit margins.

Selling and Administrative Expenses increased 12.8% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 to support the increased revenue levels and as a result of investments in office openings and the permanent recruitment business in certain markets. Expenses as a percent of revenue were slightly higher for the third quarter of 2006 compared to the third quarter of 2005 but were in line with prior year for the first nine months of 2006.

The OUP Margin for Other Operations in the third quarter of 2006 was 2.8% compared to 3.1% for the same period in 2005. This decline is due to the decline in Gross Profit Margin along with the increase in Selling and Administrative Expense. OUP Margin for the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was 2.9% and 2.7%, respectively.

Financial Measures

Constant Currency Reconciliation

Changes in our revenues and operating profits include the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We provide “constant currency” calculations in this quarterly report to remove the impact of these items. We typically express year-over-year variances that are calculated in constant currency as a percentage.

When we use the term “constant currency,” it means that we have translated financial data for a period into U.S. Dollars using the same foreign currency exchange rates that we used to translate financial data for the previous period. We believe that this calculation is a useful measure, indicating the actual growth of our operations. We utilize constant currency results in our analysis of subsidiary or segment performance. We also use constant currency when analyzing our performance against that of our competitors. Earnings from our subsidiaries are not generally repatriated to the United States, and we typically do not incur significant gains or losses on foreign currency transactions with our subsidiaries. Therefore, changes in foreign currency exchange rates primarily impact only reported earnings and not our actual cash flow or economic condition.

Constant currency percent variances, along with a reconciliation of these amounts to certain of our reported results, are provided below.


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005
	Reported Amount ^(a)		Reported Variance		Impact of Currency		Variance in Constant Currency
	(Unaudited)
Revenues from Services:
United States	$	542.1	2.0	%	—	%	2.0	%
France		1,654.0	11.8		4.8		7.0
EMEA		1,668.0	19.1		5.2		13.9
Jefferson Wells		93.9	(9.6	)	—		(9.6	)
Right Management		91.4	(4.8	)	2.2		(7.0	)
Other Operations		595.4	11.6		(1.8	)	13.4

Manpower Inc.	$	4,644.8	12.1		3.3		8.8

Gross Profit	$	844.2	11.6		3.0		8.6

Selling and Administrative Expenses	$	675.3	8.1		2.8		5.3

Operating Profit	$	168.9	28.0		4.1		23.9

^(a)	Represents amounts in millions for the three months ended September 30, 2006.


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 compared to 2005
	Reported Amount ^(a)		Reported Variance		Impact of Currency		Variance in Constant Currency
	(Unaudited)
Revenues from Services:
United States	$	1,587.0	4.8	%	—	%	4.8	%
France		4,430.1	7.7		(0.9	)	8.6
EMEA		4,691.0	12.4		(1.4	)	13.8
Jefferson Wells		288.2	(0.6	)	—		(0.6	)
Right Management		291.3	(5.6	)	(0.5	)	(5.1	)
Other Operations		1,727.1	11.0		(2.9	)	13.9

Manpower Inc.	$	13,014.7	8.8		(1.2	)	10.0

Gross Profit	$	2,378.0	9.2		(1.1	)	10.3

Selling and Administrative Expenses	$	2,010.3	7.3		(1.3	)	8.6

Operating Profit	$	367.7	20.9		(0.2	)	21.1

^(a)	Represents amounts in millions for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash provided by operating activities was $226.1million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $175.0 million for the first nine months of 2005. This increase is due to the higher earnings level and an improved working capital position. Cash provided by operating activities before changes in working capital requirements was $275.4 million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $248.5 million in the first nine months of 2005.

Accounts receivable increased to $3,772.1 million as of September 30, 2006 from $3,208.2 million as of December 31, 2005. This increase is due to the higher business volumes in the third quarter of 2006 compared to that of the fourth quarter in 2005 and due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2005 exchange rates, the September 30, 2006 balance would have been approximately $195.1 million lower than reported. Our consolidated Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) as of September 2006 was approximately 1.7 days higher than prior year, due primarily to a timing issue with customer payments.

Capital expenditures were $47.3 million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $55.9 million during the first nine months of 2005. These expenditures are primarily comprised of purchases of computer equipment, office furniture and other costs related to office openings and refurbishments.

From time to time, we acquire and invest in companies throughout the world, including franchises. The total cash consideration for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, in the first nine months of 2006 was $7.8 million.

On January 31, 2006, we received final approval from the Swedish Competition Authorities and sold a non-core payroll processing business in Sweden. A pre-tax gain of $29.3 million ($23.7 million after tax, or $0.27 per diluted share) related to this sale was recorded in the first nine months of 2006. Net proceeds from this transaction were $29.6 million.

In December of 2005, we sold one of our available-for-sale investments for a gain of $2.6 million. Proceeds from this transaction of $8.8 million were received in the first nine months of 2006.

Net debt repayments during the first nine months of 2006 were $0.6 million compared to $25.6 million in the first nine months of 2005.

On June 14, 2006, we offered and sold €200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% notes due June 14, 2013 (the “€200 Million Notes”). The net proceeds of €198.1 million ($249.5 million) were invested in cash equivalents until July 26, 2006, when they were used to repay our €200.0 million notes due July 2006 (the “1999 €200 Million Notes”) as described below. The €200 Million Notes were issued at a price of 99.349% to yield an effective interest rate of 4.862%. The discount of €1.3 million ($1.6 million) will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes. Interest is payable annually on June 14 beginning in 2007. The €200 Million Notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all of our existing and future senior unsecured debt and other liabilities. We may redeem the €200 Million Notes, in whole but not in part, at our option at any time for a redemption price as determined in accordance with the terms of the €200 Million Notes. The €200 Million Notes also contain certain customary restrictive covenants and events of default. See Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – for additional information.

Our 1999 €200 Million Notes ($254.3 million), due July 2006, were retired on July 26, 2006 with the net proceeds from the €200 Million Notes and other available cash.

In July 2006, we amended our $200 Million Receivables Facility, extending its maturity to July 2007 and reducing the fees for the facility. All other terms remain substantially unchanged. There were no borrowings outstanding under this facility as of September 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.

As of September 30, 2006, we had borrowings of $126.7 million and letters of credit of $4.0 million outstanding under our $625.0 million revolving credit agreement. There were no borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program. Beginning in 2006, the letters of credit outstanding under the revolving credit agreement were substantially reduced as certain letters of credit have been issued directly by third parties rather than under the revolving credit agreement.

Our $625.0 million revolving credit agreement requires, among other things, that we comply with a Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of less than 3.25 to 1 and a fixed charge ratio of greater than 2.00 to 1. As defined in the agreement, we had a Debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 1.33 to 1 and a fixed charge ratio of 3.00 to 1 as of September 30, 2006. Based upon our current forecasts, we expect to be in compliance with these covenants throughout 2006.

In addition to the previously mentioned facilities, we maintain separate bank facilities with financial institutions to meet working capital needs of our subsidiary operations. As of September 30, 2006, such facilities totaled $290.7 million, of which $264.0 million was unused. Under the revolving credit agreement effective January 2006, total subsidiary borrowings cannot exceed $150.0 million in the first, second and fourth quarters, and $300.0 million in the third quarter of each year.

In October 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 5.0 million shares of our common stock, not to exceed a total price of $250.0 million. As of September 30, 2006 we have repurchased 4.3 million shares at a total cost of $250.0 million under the 2005 authorization, completing the repurchases allowed under the authorization. During the first half of 2005, we repurchased 5.0 million shares at a total cost of $203.5 million under the 2004 authorization.

On April 25, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.27 per share, which was paid on June 14, 2006 to shareholders of record on June 5, 2006.

On October 31, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.32 per share, which is payable on December 15, 2006 to shareholders of record on December 5, 2006.

We have aggregate commitments related to debt repayments, operating leases, severances and office closure costs, and certain other commitments of $1,779.7 million as of September 30, 2006 compared to $1,669.9 million as of December 31, 2005.

In connection with the acquisition of Right Management in 2004, we established reserves for severances and other office lease closure costs related to streamlining Right Management’s worldwide operations that totaled $24.5 million. As of September 30, 2006, approximately $21.5 million has been paid from these reserves, of which $2.1 million was paid in the first nine months of 2006. Approximately $1.0 of the remaining $3.0 will be paid in the fourth quarter of 2006, with the remaining $2.0 to be paid by 2008.

In the first quarter of 2006, we recorded expenses totaling $9.5 million in the United Kingdom, and $1.2 million at Right Management for severances and other office closure costs related to reorganizations at these entities. Of the $9.5 million in the United Kingdom, $4.1 million was paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, and we expect that a majority of the remaining $5.4 million will be paid in the remainder of 2006. All of the reorganization costs at Right Management were paid during the first quarter of 2006.

In 2005, we recorded total expenses of $15.3 million in France and $4.0 million at Right Management for severance costs related to reorganization in both segments. As of September 30, 2006, $7.6 million has been paid from the reserve in France, $6.3 million of which was paid in 2006. The majority of the remaining $7.7 million is expected to be paid in the fourth quarter of 2006. The full $4.0 million recognized at Right Management was paid in 2005.

We also have entered into guarantee contracts and stand-by letters of credit that total approximately $126.2 million and $128.6 million as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively ($52.8 million and $41.0 million for guarantees, respectively, and $73.4 million and $87.6 million for stand-by letters of credit, respectively). Guarantees primarily relate to bank accounts and indebtedness. The stand-by letters of credit relate to workers’ compensation and indebtedness. If certain conditions were met under these arrangements, we would be required to satisfy our obligation in cash. Due to the nature of these arrangements and our historical experience, we do not expect to make any significant payments under these arrangements. Therefore, they have been excluded from our aggregate commitments identified above.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment

In connection with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we are required to perform goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment reviews, at least annually, using a fair value-based approach. The majority of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets result from our acquisitions of Right Management, Elan, and Jefferson Wells.

As part of our impairment reviews, we estimate fair value primarily by using a discounted cash flow analysis and, for certain larger reporting units, we may also consider market comparables. Significant assumptions used in this analysis include: expected future revenue growth rates, OUP margins, and working capital levels; a discount rate; and a terminal value multiple.

We have completed our annual impairment review for 2006 and determined there to be no impairment of either goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets. We plan to perform our next annual impairment review during the third quarter of 2007.

We may be required to perform an impairment review prior to our scheduled annual review if certain events occur, including lower-than-forecasted earnings levels for certain reporting units. In addition, changes to other assumptions could significantly impact our estimate of the fair value of our reporting units. Such a change may result in a goodwill impairment charge, which could have a significant impact on the reportable segments that include the related reporting units and our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payments,” (“SFAS 123R”) using the modified prospective method. The modified prospective method requires compensation cost to be recognized beginning on the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date. As such, prior periods will not reflect restated amounts. (See Note 3 for further information.)

During September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires that we recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined benefit and retiree medical plans (our “Plans”) as an asset or liability in our consolidated balance sheets, with changes in the funded status recognized through comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. We estimate the impact of adopting SFAS 158 to be approximately $5.0, million using current exchange rates, which will result in a reduction in Shareholder’s Equity on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. SFAS 158 will also require expanded disclosures in our notes to consolidated financial statements, but will have no impact on our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows for the year ending December 31, 2006. SFAS 158 also requires us to measure the funded status of our Plans as of the balance sheet date, rather than as of an earlier measurement date, by 2008. We do not expect the impact of the change in measurement date to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements made in this quarterly report that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. In addition, from time to time, we and our representatives may make statements that are forward-looking. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The information under the heading “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, which information is incorporated herein by reference, provides cautionary statements identifying, for purposes of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” and similar expressions. Some or all of the factors identified in our annual report on Form 10-K may be beyond our control. We caution that any forward-looking statement reflects only our belief at the time the statement is made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain disclosures about market risks affecting us. There have been no material changes to the information provided which would require additional disclosures as of the date of this filing, except for the issuance of our €200.0 million notes in June 2006, and the repayment of our €200.0 million notes in July 2006, all of which have been previously identified. Our €200.0 million notes issued in June 2006 have been designated, as of July 26, 2006, as a hedge of our net investment in subsidiaries with the Euro-functional currency.

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures

We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation discussed above that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In October 2005, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 5.0 million shares of our common stock, not to exceed a total purchase price of $250.0 million. The authorization permitted share repurchases from time to time through a variety of methods, including open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, forward repurchase agreements or similar facilities. The following table shows the total amount of shares repurchased under this authorization during the third quarter of 2006.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share		Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan	Approximate number of shares that may yet be purchased
July 1 - 31, 2006	661,600	$	59.12	661,600	2,068,100
August 1 - 31, 2006	1,340,700		57.94	1,340,700	727,400	⁽¹⁾
September 1 - 30, 2006	—		—	—	—

⁽¹⁾	The total purchase price for the shares repurchased was $250.0 million, therefore no additional shares can be repurchased under the 2005 authorization.

On October 31, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 5 million shares of our common stock, not to exceed a total purchase price of $325.0 million. Share repurchases may be made from time to time and may be implemented through a variety of methods, including open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions, accelerated share repurchase programs, forward repurchase agreements or similar facilities.

Item 5 – Other Information

Audit Committee Approval of Audit-Related and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has approved the following audit-related and non-audit services performed or to be performed for us by our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, to date in 2006:

(a)

preparation and/or review of tax returns, including sales and use tax, excise tax, income tax, local tax, property tax, and value-added tax;

(b)

consultation regarding appropriate handling of items on tax returns, required disclosures, elections and filing positions available to us;

(c)

assistance with tax audits and examinations, including providing technical advice on technical interpretations, applicable laws and regulations, tax accounting, foreign tax credits, foreign income tax, foreign earnings and profits, U.S. treatment of foreign subsidiary income, and value-added tax, excise tax or equivalent taxes in foreign jurisdictions;

(d)

advice and assistance with respect to transfer pricing matters, including the preparation of reports used by us to comply with taxing authority documentation requirements regarding royalties and inter-company pricing, and assistance with tax exemptions;

(e)

advice regarding tax issues relating to our internal reorganizations;

(f)

assistance relating to reporting under and compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, including the issuance of consents and comfort letters;

(g)

reviews of the quarterly financial statements;

(h)

consultation regarding current, proposed and newly adopted accounting pronouncements;

(i)

audit of a foreign employee pension plan;

(j)

assistance with a review at a foreign subsidiary; and

(k)

verification of a government subsidy application.

Item 6 – Exhibits


10.1		Settlement Agreement dated July 28, 2006 between Manpower France SAS and Jean-Pierre Lemonnier.

10.2		Change of Control Severance Agreement dated September 6, 2006 between Manpower Inc. and Owen Sullivan, incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 6, 2006.

12.1		Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31.1		Certification of Jeffrey A. Joerres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of Michael J. Van Handel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Statement of Jeffrey A. Joerres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.

32.2		Statement of Michael J. Van Handel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		MANPOWER INC. (Registrant)

Date: November 2, 2006		/s/ Michael J. Van Handel
		Michael J. Van Handel Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary (Signing on behalf of the Registrant and as the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Settlement Agreement dated July 28, 2006 between Manpower France SAS and Jean-Pierre Lemonnier.

10.2		Change of Control Severance Agreement dated September 6, 2006 between Manpower Inc. and Owen Sullivan, incorporated by reference to Item 1.01 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 6, 2006.

12.1		Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31.1		Certification of Jeffrey A. Joerres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2		Certification of Michael J. Van Handel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1		Statement of Jeffrey A. Joerres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.

32.2		Statement of Michael J. Van Handel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350.

Settlement Agreement

EXHIBIT 10.1

TRANSLATION FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED:

MANPOWER FRANCE SAS, whose registered office is at 7-9 rue Jacques Bingen, 75017 Paris, registered at the Registry of Companies of Paris with number 429 955 297, represented by Mr. Jean-François Ferret, duly empowered to do so,

hereafter called the “Company”

OF THE ONE PART

AND:

Monsieur Jean-Pierre Lemonnier, having its residence at 12, boulevard Perreire, 75017 Paris,

hereafter called “Mr. Lemonnier”

OF THE OTHER PART

The Company and Mr. Lemonnier being hereafter called the “Parties”.

1.	HISTORY OF THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP

Mr. Lemonnier was engaged by the Company under a permanent contract of January 26, 1998, as Human Resources Manager. He was later promoted to the position of President of the Company and of Manpower Holdings Inc., his contract of employment having been suspended.

Moreover, in the frame of his employment contract, Mr. Lemonnier was subject to the “accords nationaux des entreprises de travail temporaire – personnel permanent” and the in-house collective agreements specifically negotiated by the Company (the “Agreements”).

By letter of June 5^th, 2006, Mr. Lemonnier was convened to a preliminary meeting for his possible dismissal to be held on June 23^rd, 2006 which he did not attend.

He was also revoked from his offices as President of Manpower France Holding SAS and Manpower France during the shareholders meetings held respectively on June 23^rd, 2006 and June 28^th, 2006.

His dismissal was notified by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt on June 30^th, 2006. His dismissal letter was presented by the post office on July 4^th, 2006. His notice period of three (3) months, which he was exempt from working, will end on October 3^rd, 2006.

The cause invoked for the dismissal was indicated in his dismissal letter (Schedule 1).

The same grounds were used in order to remove him from his corporate offices.

2.	DISPUTE

2.1	Mr. Lemonnier immediately contested his dismissal considering that its ground were ill founded and instructed a legal counsel to assist him in the present negotiation and possibly to take the matter to court to obtain repair of his loss (Schedule 2).

He contested the methods used by the group to proceed to his dismissal and revoke him by e-mail and by registered letters of June 9^th, 2006 and of June 14^th, 2006.

He consequently claimed, beyond payment of the sums resulting from the undertaking from the Company of May 8^th, 2003, damages to cover his professional and moral loss for an amount of EUR 1,200,000 as well as damages to compensate the loss suffered from the loss of his stock-options and restricted stocks and other plans for an amount of over EUR 2,000,000.

2.2	The Company for its part maintained its position considering that the dismissal is perfectly well founded as well as the revocations (Schedule 2).

Moreover, the Company reminded Mr. Lemonnier that the various stocks and stock-options plans that he received do not entitle him to benefit from rights in conditions other than those applying to other corporate offices or employees of the group. Consequently, the Company contests that Mr. Lemonnier may claim damages in this respect whilst he knew perfectly the applicable regulations.

Whilst neither Party recognized the validity of the claims of the other and in order to terminate the dispute between them, negotiations started between the Parties.

After several discussions, the Parties came together to attempt to terminate their dispute in a final manner so as to avoid a court action through reciprocal concessions thus terminating any dispute between them.

An agreement was therefore reached for an irrevocable and final settlement in the following conditions.

- 2 -

3.	SETTLEMENT

3.1	Waiver by the Company

3.1.1

In consideration of the waiver below, the Company agrees, exceptionally, to take into consideration the specific career damage and psychological harm alleged by Mr. Lemonnier and, accordingly, agrees to grant him compensation as a final settlement of a total gross amount of EUR 1,308,000; this amount will be paid as follows:

70 per cent of this amount (i.e. the gross amount of EUR 915,600) is paid at the signing of the settlement agreement;

the balance of this amount will be paid at the end of Mr. Lemonnier’s employment contract, provided that Mr. Lemonnier has complied, as of October 3, 2006, with the obligations defined in articles 3.6 and 3.7 below; it is however expressly agreed between the Parties that the Company would be entitled to refuse the payment of the balance of the settlement amount only if the Company can bring evidence as of 3 October 2006 that the information covered by the articles 3.6 et 3.7 below were made public or disclosed by Mr. Lemonnier himself.

3.1.2

In addition, Mr. Lemonnier will also be paid the amounts legally and contractually due to him with his final pay, i.e.:

(a)

the compensation in lieu of notice, paid each month, with the relevant pay slip, corresponding to total a gross amount of EUR 95,544 (subject to social contributions);

(b)

compensation in respect of his accrued paid holiday and any other rest days accrued but not taken, due on the period to the end of his notice period (i.e. October 3^rd, 2006) corresponding to the gross amount of EUR 149,145.55 (subject to social security contributions), which will be paid to him at the end of his notice period with its final pay;

(c)

severance pay due pursuant to the Agreements taking into account his seniority as from the date of his hiring until the end of his notice period (i.e. October 3^rd, 2006), i.e. a net amount of EUR 88,232, which will be paid to him at the end of his notice period with its final pay;

- 3 -

(d)

his prorated thirteenth month salary for 2006 for the period ending on October 3^rd, 2006, agreed between the Parties at the amount of EUR 8,218.81 (subject to social security contributions), which will be paid to him at the end of his notice period with its final pay.

3.1.3

The settlement amount indicated above together with the severance pay due to Mr. Lemonnier pursuant the Agreements exceeds the exemption ceiling for social security and income tax purposes of EUR 186,408 for 2006 in accordance with article 80 Duodecies of the French General Tax Code and article L.242-1 of the French Social Security Code. As a result, the excess amount will be subject to employee’s and employer’s share of social security contributions and declared to the Tax Administration in compliance with the law.

The fraction of the above between the severance pay under the Agreements and EUR 186,408 will be solely subject to the CSG and CRDS taxes deducted by the Company before payment of the resulting net balance to Mr. Lemonnier who shall bear them exclusively.

3.1.4

It is expressly agreed that the Company will bear the attorney fees incurred by Mr. Lemonnier for his defense within the following proceedings:

(a)

proceedings before the Tribunal de Police following the writ of summons of April 11, 2006 initiated by the Syndicat National du Travail Temporaire – CFTC (see writ of summons attached in Schedule 3);

(b)

potential proceedings following the complaint initiated by the Syndicat National du Travail Temporaire – CFTC before the Public Prosecutor (Procureur de la République) on the ground of misuse of company property (abus de bien sociaux) and relating to the restructurings implemented from the end of 2003 to the beginning of 2004 within the Company, to the trademark license and the disposal of the trademark of the Company to Manpower Inc. (letter of March 14, 2006 from Deloitte, the auditors to the Company, attached in Schedule 3),

(c)

potential proceedings of the enquiry initiated by the Direction Générale, de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la Répression des Fraudes, and followed by the a search of November 30, 2004 authorized by the Civil Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) of Bobigny on November 18, 2004 (notice from the Direction Générale, de la Concurrence, de la Concurrence et de la Répression des Fraudes of November 30, 2004 attached in Schedule 3),

provided that Mr. Lemonnier’s attorney is first submitted to and approved by the Company; in return, Mr. Lemonnier undertakes to present his defense in such actions whilst respecting the Company’s interests and the interests of the companies of the group to which the Company belongs.

- 4 -

3.1.5

Finally, Mr. Lemonnier is released from any non-compete covenant towards the Company and the group to which it belongs.

3.2	Waiver by Mr. Lemonnier

Mr. Lemonnier gives the Company, at the same time as signing the present agreement, a dismissal letter for his corporate offices, i.e.:

(i)

Corporate offices in the subsidiaries of Manpower France Holding:


-	Supplay SA:	President of the Board of Directors and General Manager

-	Solertis SA:	permanent representative of Manpower France Holding to the Board of Directors

-	Manpower Business Services SAS:	President

-	Manpower Placement SAS:	President

-	Manpower services aux personnes SAS:	President

-	Manpower services aux particuliers SAS:	President

(ii)

Corporate office in the subsidiary of Manpower France:

Pixid SNC:

representative of Manpower

France in the management board

(iii)

Corporate office in the Danish company Manpower Europe Holdings ApS.

3.3 Renunciations of Mr. Lemonnier

3.3.1

Mr. Lemonnier agrees that the amounts specified above at article 3.1.1 cover his full material, moral and professional loss resulting from the termination of his contract of employment and the revocation of his corporate offices. He acknowledges that no further sum of any nature whatsoever will remain due to him whether for the performance or the termination of his contract of employment or his corporate offices, including his rights to bonuses or compensation for share plans or stock-options.

Mr. Lemonnier therefore renounces expressly in a final and irrevocable manner to make any claim for salaries, bonuses, professional expenses, holidays, compensation for reduction of working time and generally renounces any other claim of any nature.

Similarly, Mr. Lemonnier renounces expressly in a final and irrevocable manner to make any claim on amounts paid within the present agreement and to contest in any manner the calculation method which enabled the Company to fix such amounts of which Mr. Lemonnier was informed precisely and which he accepts without reserve and in full knowledge thereof.

- 5 -

3.3.2

Mr. Lemonnier agrees that for purposes of measuring both the vesting and expiration dates of stock options granted to him under Manpower’s stock-option plans, the cessation of his employment under those plans shall be the end date of his notice period (i.e. October 3, 2006). In addition, Mr. Lemonnier acknowledges that, with respect to any vested stock options he holds at the end of the notice period or shares that he has acquired from prior exercises of stock options under these plans, he shall continue to be subject to the terms of the agreements and plans governing the grant of such options (including, but not limited to, any sale restrictions in the stock-option agreements).

3.3.3

Mr Lemonnier renounces expressly his rights to the training right (DIF).

3.4	Renunciations of the Company

The Company renounces to look for Mr Lemonnier’s civil responsibility for his actions as President of Manpower France (except to the extent such actions constitute a transaction from which Mr. Lemonnier derived an improper personal profit).

For the avoidance of doubt, the Company (or any company of group to which the Company belongs) does not renounce to look to Mr. Lemonnier for liabilities due to any criminal actions, provided that these actions are discovered or identified as being criminal after the termination of his duties within the Company (or any company of the group to which the Company belongs).

3.5	Restitution of materials and documents

Mr. Lemonnier undertakes to return at the latest eight days following the signing of the agreement all materials and documents in his possession belonging to the Company without any further demand. Further, he undertakes not to keep any copy or reproduction of the said documents or materials.

3.6	Confidentiality of the settlement

The Parties confirm that up until now, they have not revealed to anyone any information relating to the existence or contents of this settlement as well as the grounds for the dismissal and undertake to continue to keep the strictest confidentiality in this respect in the future.

This settlement shall remain confidential between the Parties except (i) in the event of an express request form the administration, (ii) in the event the document is required for the Company’s auditors or (iii) in the event the document should be presented before a court and, in this last case, only if one of the Parties does not perform the undertakings made within the present agreement. Should one of the Parties have to produce this agreement for the above reasons, it will need to inform the other Party in advance by registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt.

- 6 -

3.7	Discretion / Denigrating remarks

Mr. Lemonnier also undertakes after his departure from the Company, not to reveal or use for his own account or for the account of any third party, any confidential information concerning the financial, economic, commercial, administrative etc. situation of the Company or of any company in the group to which it belongs.

Mr. Lemonnier and the Company undertake not to make any denigrating and/or harmful remarks in the presence of anyone against one another.

3.8	Waiver – Renunciation

The Parties undertake to perform this agreement, which forms a whole, in good faith and to fully assist in the preparation and signing of any documents made necessary for the performance of the provisions hereof, as the case may be.

Mr. Lemonnier and the Company acknowledge that the payments and concessions set out will be effected as full and final settlement conforming to the provisions of articles 2044 et sec. of the Code civil and, in particular, of article 2052 of the said “Code civil”. Subject to the execution of the present agreement and in particular the payment of the sums mentioned at article 3.1 above, Mr. Lemonnier acknowledges that the aforementioned payments provide him with all the rights (including any compensation, bonuses or salary) whatsoever to which he may have been entitled under his contract of employment including for breach of the contract and the payments put an end to all dispute existing or which may exist from the legal or de facto relationship between him and the Company.

In this regard, this settlement agreement will have the same legal effect between the Parties as a judicial decision made as a res judicata court decision.

Consequently, Mr. Lemonnier expressly represents for himself and his heirs, pursuant to article 1121 of the French civil code, to renounce all claims, complaints, actions or proceedings of whatever nature against the Company concerning any question relating to the performance or termination of his contract of employment.

Equally, the Company expressly undertakes not to make any claim against Mr. Lemonnier and undertakes not to enter into or pursue any court proceedings against him in respect of the relationship between the Parties particularly resulting from the termination of the contract of employment (except as provided in clause 3.4 above).

- 7 -

3.9	Tax and social security treatment

Mr. Lemonnier acknowledges that he is perfectly aware of how the amounts shall be paid according to the settlement agreement, regarding the French Social Security, unemployment and Tax Authorities and that such questions shall not jeopardize the validity of the settlement agreement. In this respect, Mr. Lemonnier is informed that the settlement amount paid to him under the present agreement will be declared to the relevant administrations or bodies as required by law.

Made in Paris, on July 28, 2006

In duplicate.


/s/ Read and approved – agreed for final and irrevocable settlement in accordance with articles 2044 et seq. of the Civil Code and waiver of any court action, under the conditions provided in this agreement.		/s/ Read and approved – agreed for final and irrevocable settlement in accordance with articles 2044 et seq. of the Civil Code and waiver of any court action, under the conditions provided in this agreement.

Jean-Francois Ferret		Jean-Pierre Lemonnier

On behalf of MANPOWER France SAS By Mr. Jean-François Ferret¹		Mr. Jean-Pierre Lemonnier¹

¹	Signature to be preceded by the words in the employee’s handwriting “Read and approved—agreed for final and irrevocable settlement in accordance with articles 2044 et seq. of the Civil Code and waiver of any court action, under the conditions provided in this agreement”.

- 8 -

Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Exhibit 12.1

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION

OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

MANPOWER INC.

(in millions)


	9 Months Ended September 30, 2006
Earnings:
Earnings before income taxes	$	360.9
Fixed charges		121.4

	$	482.3

Fixed charges:
Interest (expensed or capitalized)	$	39.1
Estimated interest portion of rent expense		82.3

	$	121.4

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		3.97


	Years Ended December 31,
	2005		2004		2003		2002		2001
Earnings:
Earnings before income taxes	$	394.7	$	369.5	$	222.1	$	188.0	$	197.9
Fixed charges		153.4		153.2		125.0		116.5		107.4

	$	548.1	$	522.7	$	347.1	$	304.5	$	305.3

Fixed charges:
Interest (expensed or capitalized)	$	46.7	$	45.4	$	41.4	$	42.4	$	39.1
Estimated interest portion of rent expense		106.7		107.8		83.6		74.1		68.3

	$	153.4	$	153.2	$	125.0	$	116.5	$	107.4

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges		3.6		3.4		2.8		2.6		2.8

Note:

The calculation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges set forth above is in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(12). This calculation is different than the fixed charge ratio that is required by our various borrowing facilities.

Section 302 CEO Certification

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey A. Joerres, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Manpower Inc., certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manpower Inc.;

(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 2, 2006

/s/ Jeffrey A. Joerres

Jeffrey A. Joerres

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

Section 302 CFO Certification

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Van Handel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Manpower Inc., certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manpower Inc.;

(2)

(3)

(4)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(5)

(a)

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 2, 2006

/s/ Michael J. Van Handel

Michael J. Van Handel

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

Section 906 CEO Certification

Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT

Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Manpower Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

(1)

the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

MANPOWER INC.

Dated: November 2, 2006

/s/ Jeffrey A. Joerres

Jeffrey A. Joerres

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Section 906 CFO Certification

Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT

Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Manpower Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:

(1)

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

MANPOWER INC.

Dated: November 2, 2006

/s/ Michael J. Van Handel

Michael J. Van Handel

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents